ext_137365 ([identity profile] gwalla.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] gwalla 2005-01-18 01:47 am (UTC)

Actually, there is. Well, are, which is the problem. Several variants use a piece called a "chariot", but they all use it to mean a different kind of piece. There's no real standardization. That is, unless you count the chariots in the various Asian cousins to chess (xiang qi, janggi, shogi, etc.), which are rooks.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting